• Українська
  • English
ISSN 2664-2441 (Online)
ISSN 2073-9583 (Print)

Provisions on Article Review

The review procedure is applied to all articles submitted to the editorial board. The objective of a review is to promote rigorous selection of author manuscripts for publication and to make specific recommendations for their improvement. The review procedure is focused on the most objective assessment of the content of a scientific article, determination of its compliance with the journal requirements and provides a comprehensive analysis of its strengths and weaknesses. Only the articles that have value from a scientific point of view and contribute to solving current economic problems and tasks are approved for publication.

The main purpose of the review procedure is eliminating instances of substandard practice of scientific research and providing coordination and balancing of interests of authors, readers, the editorial board, reviewers and the institution where the study was carried out.

The reviewing of manuscripts is held confidentially. By submitting a manuscript to the editors of the journal, the authors entrust to the editors the results of their scientific work and creative effort, on which their reputation and career may depend. The disclosure of confidentiality of the manuscript review violates the rights of the author. The editors do not report the information concerning the manuscript (including information on its receipt, content, reviewing process, criticism by reviewers and final opinion) to anyone other than the authors and reviewers. A breach of confidentiality may only occur in instances of allegations of inauthenticity or falsification of the material, in all other cases its preservation is obligatory.

Responsibility for copyright infringement and non-compliance with existing standards in the material of the article rests on the author. Responsibility for verification of facts and data, the validity of the findings and recommendations and the scientific and practical level of the article rests on the author and reviewer.

     Sent materials are evaluated on the following criteria:

  • Informational and completeness article title and its abstract
  • The structure of the article (Requirements for articles)
  • Transparency and accessibility of the text for the target audience of the journal
  • Completeness and relevance of bibliographic descriptions cited sources
  • Correct execution of bibliographic description of cited sources
  • Compliance with the rules of style
  • Compliance of grammar rules
  • The relevance and originality of article
  • The scientific value of research
  • Clarity, correctness and transparency in the formulation of article aims and tasks
  • The quality of the main arguments ideas, thesis, provisions and conclusions of article
  • Level of author`s argumentation evidence
  • Reliability and validity of quotations and references